http://minneapolis.metblogs.com/2008/07/03/usa-1/ Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:27:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://minneapolis.metblogs.com/2008/07/03/usa-1/comment-page-1/#comment-5967 kevinfromminneapolis Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:02:18 +0000 http://minneapolis.metblogs.com/2008/07/03/usa-1/#comment-5967 Tom Rukavina. Tom Rukavina.

]]> http://minneapolis.metblogs.com/2008/07/03/usa-1/comment-page-1/#comment-5958 Art Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:36:32 +0000 http://minneapolis.metblogs.com/2008/07/03/usa-1/#comment-5958 No no, I meant I am more smartly USA #1, meaning patriotic... not all patriots are protectionist xenophobes. I am smartly USA #1 because I made pie out of cherries that have been soaked in vodka for 8 weeks. Yum yum! No no, I meant I am more smartly USA #1, meaning patriotic… not all patriots are protectionist xenophobes. I am smartly USA #1 because I made pie out of cherries that have been soaked in vodka for 8 weeks. Yum yum!

]]> http://minneapolis.metblogs.com/2008/07/03/usa-1/comment-page-1/#comment-5957 Aaron Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:30:40 +0000 http://minneapolis.metblogs.com/2008/07/03/usa-1/#comment-5957 Even though I don't agree with the law either, how can you be a "more smartly so" protectionist xenophobe? I don't think point three demonstrates any more intelligence than the original law itself and your final statements kind of put the icing on the cake. Even though I don’t agree with the law either, how can you be a "more smartly so" protectionist xenophobe? I don’t think point three demonstrates any more intelligence than the original law itself and your final statements kind of put the icing on the cake.

]]>